Lettre ouverte à The Montreal Gazette

Poorly informed about the Quebec flag

Symboles nationaux



Don Macpherson appears to be poorly informed about the Quebec flag and the Quebec legislators' goals when they adopted the fleurdelisé in 1948.
In 1966, the great ethnologist and botanist Jacques Rousseau wrote a detailed article criticizing the Quebec government for adopting the fleur-de-lis as Quebec's floral emblem instead of our indigenous iris versicolor, also known as blue flag.
In the same article, however, he insisted that the adoption in 1948 of the the fleurdelisé as Quebec's flag, was absolutely the right thing to do. He pointed out that the fleur-de-lis was by no means exclusively French and that it was part of the coats of arms of Greek, Roman, German, Lombard, Serb, Spanish and English kings. He added that the prototype flag was not the King of France's ensign, but rather the illustrious Carillon regiment that fought in the Seven Year War and that, significantly, was the only protestant unit in New France. He then congratulated the legislators both for their ecumenical approach - they predated Vatican II by 15 years -, and for respecting their mission to underscore the continued presence of French civilization in America.
In an era when the American cultural steamroller is a threat to cultural diversity everywhere, is it not comforting to know that Quebecers have widely adopted a flag that is both ecumenical and symbolic of a determined French presence in America? Of course, that may be what bothers Don Macpherson. If so, we hope he will be just as upset on February 6 when Canada starts celebrating the 50th anniversary of Queen Elizabeth's reign.
Guy Bouthillier

President, Société Saint-Jean-Baptiste

Laissez un commentaire



Aucun commentaire trouvé

Symboles nationaux

Jour du drapeau "Synopsis Choqué par l'immobilisme du Québec, le documentariste Hugo Latulippe a décidé de réunir, au printemps 2011, 53 leaders d'opinions afin de leur demander ce qu'ils pensaient du Québec moderne et ce qu'ils espéraient pour le futur. À travers une série de mots ou d'expressions, ces hommes et femmes tentent de tracer les contours d'un nouveau projet de société qui pourrait propulser le Québec dans le troisième millénaire et constituer le moteur et l'aboutissement d'une nouvelle social-démocratie. Tantôt drôles, tantôt cinglants, insolents, indignés ou inspirants, les commentaires se succèdent, avec toujours ce même objectif en tête : redonner au rêve ses lettres de noblesse." ----

Chroniques

Tribune libre -> Envoyer un texte